Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
Sections ›› Home | Forums | Guidelines | Forum Help | Fedora FAQ | Fedora News 

Go Back   FedoraForum.org > The Community Lounge > Wibble

Wibble A place to have a sensible chat, about anything non linux related. Please remember that political and religious topics are not permitted.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2009-11-07, 01:39 AM CST
Evil_Bert's Avatar
Evil_Bert Offline
Semi-retired Community Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,889
linuxfedorafirefox
Windows 7 still vulnerable

Apparently, Windows 7 is still vulnerable to eight out of ten viruses (etc.):
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11...win7_security/

Suffer in your pants, Ballmer!
__________________
.
Looking for somewhere to get started? Try the Forum Help page.
There are many alternate universes, but only this one has beer.
  #2  
Old 2009-11-07, 01:46 AM CST
Demz's Avatar
Demz Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,807
windows_7firefox
you couldnt help yourself could ya Bert, this could start a flamewar
windows will; always be Vulnerable to Viruses, so whats new?

look how many problems Linux has right now.. they cant even get X working smoothly without problems

Last edited by Demz; 2009-11-07 at 01:48 AM CST.
  #3  
Old 2009-11-07, 01:53 AM CST
MorphingDragon Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 111
macossafari
No Recent OS is perfect ATM. Snow Leopard is having growing pains.
__________________
Who knows more than just wobbly windows.

20" 1st Gen Intel iMac
  #4  
Old 2009-11-07, 01:55 AM CST
Demz's Avatar
Demz Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,807
windows_7firefox
even windows7 out sold Snow Leopard within a matter of 2 weeks i think it has been said
  #5  
Old 2009-11-07, 01:55 AM CST
tjvanwyk's Avatar
tjvanwyk Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: U.S.
Posts: 2,878
windows_7firefox
Shrug. I've been using Win7. No viruses here.
__________________
- Tom
"What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self." - Stirner
  #6  
Old 2009-11-07, 01:58 AM CST
MorphingDragon Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 111
macossafari
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demz View Post
even windows7 out sold Snow Leopard within a matter of 2 weeks i think it has been said
And Mac OSX 10.6 has more market share than Ubuntu 9.10.

How fast something sells doesn't mean anything in this context.
__________________
Who knows more than just wobbly windows.

20" 1st Gen Intel iMac
  #7  
Old 2009-11-07, 02:01 AM CST
Demz's Avatar
Demz Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,807
windows_7firefox
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjvanwyk View Post
Shrug. I've been using Win7. No viruses here.
Ditto to that,
  #8  
Old 2009-11-07, 02:09 AM CST
MorphingDragon Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 111
macossafari
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk4FIIkKXdw

Shh...

Yes I just did what you think I did.
__________________
Who knows more than just wobbly windows.

20" 1st Gen Intel iMac
  #9  
Old 2009-11-07, 02:20 AM CST
Evil_Bert's Avatar
Evil_Bert Offline
Semi-retired Community Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,889
linuxfedorafirefox
May I politely remind posters that the thead topic refers to continued malware vulnerability of Windows 7 .... which is being widely advertised as "secure" in glossy, frequently-shown TV commercials (at least in Oz). It is, IMO, a worthy topic.

Perhaps my attempt at humour threw people off ... I did use the right smiley, didn't I?

Anyway folks, as the thread starter, please stay on topic, restrain the inner fanboi and remember this is a Linux forum.
__________________
.
Looking for somewhere to get started? Try the Forum Help page.
There are many alternate universes, but only this one has beer.
  #10  
Old 2009-11-07, 02:29 AM CST
pete_1967 Offline
Clueless in a Cuckooland
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,731
linuxfedorafirefox
Isn't that UAC feature just Windows version of root login? If so, how is it supposed to prevent any moron from clicking "yes" and installing their daily malware fix?

If it's supposed to be virus and malware scanner preventing people from installing malicious programs same time, then I agree that it has failed miserably.
__________________

F9 x86_64
Lian-Li SILVER CLASSICAL SERIES
MSI K9N2 Diamond
AMD Phenom 9850 BE
XFX GeForce 8800 GT Alpha Dog 512MB GDDR3 HDTV/Dual DVI
8 GB Corsair DDR2 800MHz/PC2-6400 XMS2 DHX
2x Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB S300 RAID 1
Philips Brilliance 200W 20.1"
  #11  
Old 2009-11-07, 02:54 AM CST
leigh123linux's Avatar
leigh123linux Offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hampshire UK
Posts: 15,774
linuxfedorafirefox
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_Bert View Post
May I politely remind posters that the thead topic refers to continued malware vulnerability of Windows 7 .... which is being widely advertised as "secure" in glossy, frequently-shown TV commercials (at least in Oz). It is, IMO, a worthy topic.

Perhaps my attempt at humour threw people off ... I did use the right smiley, didn't I?

Anyway folks, as the thread starter, please stay on topic, restrain the inner fanboi and remember this is a Linux forum.

Damn you , I was just about to napalm this thread
  #12  
Old 2009-11-07, 04:22 AM CST
adrianx's Avatar
adrianx Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 888
linuxfedorafirefox
Quote:
Even when you use an administrator account, User Account Control provides heightened security. By default, most programs run with the permissions of a standard user, which limits the potential damage they (or malware acting through those programs) can do.
Microsoft.com

It will protect you from two out of ten "viruses".
__________________
Registered Linux User 460110
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ | Asus M3A78-EMH HDMI | Radeon HD 3200 256MB | 3GB DDR2 667MHz | Samsung 2333SW Plus LCD

Last edited by adrianx; 2009-11-07 at 04:25 AM CST.
  #13  
Old 2009-11-07, 07:10 AM CST
JN4OldSchool Offline
"Sean The Terrible" -- The forum Vista rep
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,722
windows_vistafirefox
Interesting article. It seems the UAC has been weakened to avoid the multiple nag messages. This is too bad. As it mentions, Vista is pretty secure. I wish they had kept the default level on par with that, I firmly believe I could ditch my anti-virus in Vista and still remain secure with just the common sense operating procedures I am used to with a Windows OS.

In any case, this says it all:

Quote:
The experiment proves that the improved User Account Control (UAC) features built into Windows 7 are not enough and that additional anti-virus protection is still required. In fairness to Redmond, Microsoft crystal clear that anti-virus remains a necessary add-on to Windows PCs
So you install AVG free or Avast like most people do anyway. Doesn't change a thing I would say that despite a couple minor hiccups like the upgrade problem and this that Windows 7 has been a great success so far. Too bad that makes some people mad. It is just an OS, really! Linux is not going to take over the world, I know that is hard to believe...
  #14  
Old 2009-11-07, 07:27 AM CST
Gordybhere Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SouthWest Of Lansing, Mi
Posts: 6
linuxfedorafirefox
No matter what Microsoft does to their ONION Operating System for security, each layer will just keep on getting worse.

Last edited by Gordybhere; 2009-11-07 at 01:19 PM CST.
  #15  
Old 2009-11-07, 08:10 AM CST
GODhack Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 67
linuxfedorafirefox
They simply do nothing.
It is vry good business model:
1) sell virus to one side
2) sell anti-virus to other side
3) sell OS where everything works for both sides (da best opt)

Quote:
look how many problems Linux has right now.. they cant even get X working smoothly without problems
Nonsense. You ever tried Linux at all?
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How vulnerable can it be? Leon gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general 4 2006-06-23 10:10 PM CDT
Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan) gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general 8 2005-02-02 03:14 PM CST
Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan) James Mckenzie gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general 2 2005-02-02 02:48 PM CST
Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan) James Mckenzie gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general 1 2005-02-02 02:48 PM CST
Mailbox vulnerable nocolour General Support 1 2004-09-14 08:15 AM CDT

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Afrikaans Albanian Arabic Belarusian Bulgarian Catalan Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Filipino Finnish French Galician German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Macedonian Malay Maltese Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swahili Swedish Taiwanese Thai Turkish Ukrainian Vietnamese Yiddish

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:14 PM CST.

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
Hosting provided by ThePlanet



All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).

FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact | Founding Members
Designed By Ewdison Then | Powered by vBulletin ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FedoraForum is Powered by Open Source Projects and Products
Thanks to NLP-er enjoy automatic translations (vBET)