Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center

Go Back   FedoraForum.org > Fedora 17/18 > Using Fedora
FedoraForum Search

Forgot Password? Join Us!

Using Fedora General support for current versions. Ask questions about Fedora and it's software that do not belong in any other forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 14th December 2006, 02:21 PM
JN4OldSchool Offline
"Sean The Terrible" -- The forum(er) Vista® rep
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,823
Usually I am all for choice and I admire all the apps and choices we have. Gnome vs KDE? Heck I use and like both. But this is one case that I strongly urge everyone, unless you have a very specific reason not to, please, please use Livna over Fresh. As Leigh said, I havent found anything I need yet that is not in Livna. If there are packages please find out who to contact and let them know. THIS HAS GOT TO END! This is just silly and has gone on long enough. I have nothing against Fresh, I used them successfully with FC5 due mainly to Stantons advice. Stanton has since moved on to Ubuntu, due mostly I believe to this very problem. I use Livna now. That is where all the drivers and codecs are anyway, they are the fork supported by FC and will probably be the winner if this crap ever comes to an end. If everyone would just use them now we can put a stop to this foolishness ourselves. And I sincerely apologize to any Fresh RPM personell or fans, but this has gone on long enough. This fight has screwed up way too many systems!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 14th December 2006, 02:24 PM
Jongi Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,952
Livna doesn't supply MythTV
__________________
Desktop (64-bit) - F12, Debian Sid, OpenSUSE 11.2, ArchLinux
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 14th December 2006, 02:28 PM
leigh123linux's Avatar
leigh123linux Offline
Retired Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,509
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jongi
Livna doesn't supply MythTV
Email Livna and ask if they could include it.



spot on JN4OldSchool
__________________
My Hardware
- CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 Hex Core 1055T 95W Edition @3.5Ghz
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H
- Cooler: Corsair H50 CPU Cooler
- RAM: Corsair Dominator 8GB (4x2GB) DDR3 1600MHz
- Graphics: Gigabyte GeForce GTS 450 OC 1024MB GDDR5

Last edited by leigh123linux; 14th December 2006 at 02:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 14th December 2006, 02:37 PM
JN4OldSchool Offline
"Sean The Terrible" -- The forum(er) Vista® rep
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,823
Fresh doesnt supply Myth either does it? Dont you have to get the Mythtv project from ATrpm's or has this changed? At any rate, still use Livna except for this package or the one or two others you would have to get elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 14th December 2006, 02:37 PM
leigh123linux's Avatar
leigh123linux Offline
Retired Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,509
Update its on the wish list at Livna

http://rpm.livna.org/rlowiki/WishList

rpm.livna.org Packages WishList

* mythtv
* ipw3945 (thl is working on it already)
* ivtv
* cinelerra
*

gstreamer-pitfdll (See http://ronald.bitfreak.net/pitfdll and freshrpms srpm: http://zod.freshrpms.net/rpm.html?id=141)

Note: this packages can not be easily packaged due to licensing problems:

* acroread (maybe we can get a license from adobe in the long term)
__________________
My Hardware
- CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 Hex Core 1055T 95W Edition @3.5Ghz
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H
- Cooler: Corsair H50 CPU Cooler
- RAM: Corsair Dominator 8GB (4x2GB) DDR3 1600MHz
- Graphics: Gigabyte GeForce GTS 450 OC 1024MB GDDR5

Last edited by leigh123linux; 14th December 2006 at 02:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 14th December 2006, 06:10 PM
Jongi Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,952
I also prefer the xine from freshrpms as this one can play rmvb files and the sound comes through. I actually had updated xine to the livna version and it lost the ability to play xvid files.
__________________
Desktop (64-bit) - F12, Debian Sid, OpenSUSE 11.2, ArchLinux
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 15th December 2006, 07:45 AM
3006828
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
we could all just use Ubunta
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 15th December 2006, 08:55 AM
cgrant Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 156
or PCLOS. PCLOS has an up-to-date version of Cinelerra in its repos and I need that.

But, by comparison pclos to FC, pclos is trailing edge - some would say that has stability advantages but I have to say I find FC6 very stable.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 15th December 2006, 10:47 AM
foolish's Avatar
foolish Offline
Retired Community Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aalesund, Norway
Age: 26
Posts: 1,888
cgrant: you could request cinelerra in the Fedora Extras wishlist: See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList

Some packagers, myself inclued, do look at the wishlist from time to time and try to give people what they want.
__________________
Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal || http://www.fedorasolved.org || Hardware Profile
- Please adhere to the FedoraForum Guidelines.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 15th December 2006, 10:59 AM
cgrant Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by foolish
cgrant: you could request cinelerra in the Fedora Extras wishlist: See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList

Some packagers, myself included, do look at the wishlist from time to time and try to give people what they want.
Freshrpm has Cinelerra. What I said was as a follow on to the suggestion to use Ubuntu in that you could also use pclos as it has Cinelerra and that would be a requirement for me. FC6 already has it covered via freshrpms and, I think, Dries. But it would be nice to see it in extras.

I certainly was not having ago at the FC packagers. I suppose I was having a go at the Ubuntu one's though
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 15th December 2006, 11:23 AM
leigh123linux's Avatar
leigh123linux Offline
Retired Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by foolish
cgrant: you could request cinelerra in the Fedora Extras wishlist: See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList

Some packagers, myself inclued, do look at the wishlist from time to time and try to give people what they want.
Thanks I'll bookmark link

Leigh
__________________
My Hardware
- CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 Hex Core 1055T 95W Edition @3.5Ghz
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H
- Cooler: Corsair H50 CPU Cooler
- RAM: Corsair Dominator 8GB (4x2GB) DDR3 1600MHz
- Graphics: Gigabyte GeForce GTS 450 OC 1024MB GDDR5
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 15th December 2006, 07:56 PM
Jongi Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,952
I'm pretty sure the attachment is related to mixing repos related to what I said about xine a couple of posts above.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	amarok-xine-error.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	17.0 KB
ID:	10806  
__________________
Desktop (64-bit) - F12, Debian Sid, OpenSUSE 11.2, ArchLinux
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 15th December 2006, 08:22 PM
Jongi Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,952
No worries. A removal and reinstall of amarok fixed the problem.
__________________
Desktop (64-bit) - F12, Debian Sid, OpenSUSE 11.2, ArchLinux
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 16th December 2006, 03:18 AM
3006828
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
fc6 still playes ok with apt?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
mixing, repos

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Q: Mixing repos aero-z Using Fedora 0 3rd May 2006 08:47 AM
Mixing repos ? gertdesmet Using Fedora 4 31st March 2006 11:07 AM


Current GMT-time: 16:18 (Sunday, 19-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat